![]() To judge an image with only default sharpening applied doesn't tell the full story.Īttached are two results from ACR-PPing of the DPR studio test charts for the Pana LX100 at ISO200. The default sharpening of ACR is indeed on the low side. Hence some sharpening is needed to restore something akin to what the sensor captured. I plan to continue experimenting with RPP for a few weeks, at least, to see whether I can learn to get more advantage from it. It opens almost instantly, and exports a TIFF to PS in about 7 seconds, which is much faster than what I can do with Capture NX or Lightroom. aliasing), and that will soften the image. For what it's worth, RPP runs blazingly fast on my MacPro 8-core. The de-mosaic process will almost certainly include some filtering to remove interpolation artefacts (e.g. Some input sharpening is almost inevitable. Adobe default sharpening is fairly low compared to other raw processors I've used (which is not many - mainly Nikon ones). ![]() In practice, many raw processors are non-destructive, so the initial sharpening can be changed (and often the default initial sharpening itself can be changed). If ACR does the least amount of sharpening of the RAW converters, then in my book that's the best software to use for giving you the most control over the final result. Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram Sign up for our weekly newsletter Submit a News Tip. Get answers to your questions in our photography forums. Personally I never sharpen an image until the very last step, and I would not want any RAW convertor to sharpen the image before I have done all the other processing steps I will take. Expert news, reviews and videos of the latest digital cameras, lenses, accessories, and phones. To me, letting a software algorithm determine how much sharpening you start with is not an advantage if you want full control over your images. I've never seen ringing in CNX or other program with simple sharpening algorithm.īTW, COP10 has functionality to suppress the halo artifacts. Raw Photo Processor (very good) Started Discussions Forum: Threaded view. Best cameras and lenses 2019 All forums Fujifilm X System / SLR Talk Change forum. the interpolation of the unique fuji sensor layout is implemented well and give nice sharp details that are on par with fuji's own results. News Reviews Articles Buying Guides Sample Images Videos Cameras Lenses Phones Printers Forums Galleries Challenges. My initial impression is that the quality of the files is very good. In case of spatial domain processing some sharpening algorithms were producing halo-like artifacts. The interface is a bit getting used to, but once you get the hang of it it's not too difficult. deconvolution performed in spatial domain). This kind of artifact often appears when too steep filter was used in frequency domain processing (also some iterative algorithms working in spatial domain can produce "ringing", eg. "Ringing" is term often used to describe artifacts that resembles ripples on the water. I've not tested many raw convertors, but I've certainly found that Nikon raw convertors (NX2 and now NXD) apply more sharpening by default - sometimes too much sharpening leading to ringing on edges. Last Camera raw 2017 vs Capture one 10 Vs Raw Photo Processor (RPP) beta*īecause ACR/Lightroom apply less default sharpening that most other raw convertors?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |